Ecosystem comparisons

Sybil resistance and identity protocols, compared attribute by attribute

Every comparison below is generated from one shared registry of published protocol behaviour — proof method, biometrics, KYC, key custody, reputation model, token and revocation control. Same fields for every protocol, so the tables are directly comparable.

Ecosystem openness matrix

The matrix scores what a protocol asks of a user and how much of the result stays verifiable in public. It is not a quality, security or market ranking, and it is not derived from TrustLayer trust scores.

#ProtocolCategoryOpennessAsks the user for
1TrustLayer ProtocolPeer-vouched human trust scores on BaseProof of personhood10/10a wallet signature only
2BrightIDSocial graph verification partiesProof of personhood9/10a wallet signature only
3IdenaProof-of-person blockchain with flip puzzlesProof of personhood9/10a wallet signature only
4Proof of HumanityVideo registry with crypto-economic challengesProof of personhood9/10a wallet signature only
5Gitcoin Passport (Human Passport)Stamp aggregation from third-party accountsAttestation aggregation7/10biometrics, KYC documents
6Worldcoin (World ID)Iris-scan proof of personhoodProof of personhood5/10biometrics, special hardware
7CivicKYC-backed on-chain identity passesKYC-anchored identity3/10biometrics, KYC documents
8Galxe PassportKYC-anchored credential passport for campaignsKYC-anchored identity2/10biometrics, KYC documents

Criteria and the points each one awards are shown in full on every comparison page.

TrustLayer head-to-head

Same-category comparisons

Query this data instead of copying it

The registry, the openness matrix and every comparison are available as JSON under /api/v1/protocols and /api/v1/compare/{slug}, licensed CC BY 4.0 with attribution.

Developer API