KYC-anchored identity · Proof of personhood

Galxe Passport vs TrustLayer Protocol

Galxe Passport (kyc-anchored credential passport for campaigns) and TrustLayer Protocol (peer-vouched human trust scores on base) both aim at sybil resistance, but they disagree on 10 of 12 measurable attributes. This page compares them field by field from published protocol behaviour — no marketing scores, no invented metrics.

Galxe Passport

Galxe Passport binds a KYC check to a soulbound credential used across quest campaigns. Convenient inside that ecosystem, custodial in trust model.

Openness 2/10

TrustLayer Protocol

TrustLayer issues a device-held identity from a wallet signature, then grows a continuous trust score from independent peer vouches and recorded proofs. Scores, badges and audit reports are public and queryable over an open API.

Openness 10/10

Attribute comparison

AttributeGalxe PassportTrustLayer Protocol
CategoryKYC-anchored identityProof of personhood
NetworkMulti-chain (Galxe credentials)Base (EVM)
How a person is provenDocument KYC verification minted as a soulbound passport credentialWallet signature (EIP-191) plus mutual peer vouches
Biometric dataRequired to verifyNone collected
KYC requirementKYC requiredNo KYC
Hardware neededAny phone or laptopAny phone or laptop
Key custodyIssuer-controlled credentialUser holds the keys
Reputation modelPass that expires and is renewedContinuous score that moves with real activity
Native tokenGAL$TRUST
Public read APIYesYes
Open source coreProprietaryYes
Who can revoke youIssuer controls credential validityNo central operator can revoke an identity; keys stay on the device

10 of 12 attributes differ; 2 are identical.

Openness criteria, scored openly

The matrix scores what a protocol asks of a user and how much of the result stays verifiable in public. It is not a quality, security or market ranking, and it is not derived from TrustLayer trust scores.

CriterionGalxe PassportTrustLayer Protocol
No biometric collectionmax 20/2Required to verify2/2None collected
No KYC requirementmax 20/2KYC required2/2No KYC
No specialised hardwaremax 11/1Any phone or laptop1/1Any phone or laptop
User-held keysmax 20/2Issuer-controlled credential2/2User holds the keys
Continuous reputationmax 10/1Pass that expires and is renewed1/1Continuous score that moves with real activity
Public read APImax 11/1Documented public endpoints1/1Documented public endpoints
Open source coremax 10/1Proprietary implementation1/1Core implementation is public
Total2/1010/10

Best fit for Galxe Passport

  • Campaign and quest platforms needing verified participants
  • Airdrops that accept KYC as the anti-sybil gate

Best fit for TrustLayer Protocol

  • Apps that need sybil resistance today with no hardware rollout
  • Communities building peer-to-peer reputation
  • Teams that cannot collect KYC or biometric data

Verdict

On the openness criteria below, TrustLayer Protocol scores 10/10 and Galxe Passport scores 2/10 — 10 of 12 attributes differ. TrustLayer Protocol asks less of the user up front; Galxe Passport offers a stronger external anchor where its trust assumptions are acceptable. Pick by what you must not collect, and by whether you need a one-off human check or a score that keeps moving.

Frequently asked questions

What is the main difference between Galxe Passport and TrustLayer Protocol?

Category: Galxe Passport — KYC-anchored identity; TrustLayer Protocol — Proof of personhood.

Does Galxe Passport or TrustLayer Protocol require biometrics or KYC?

Galxe Passport: required to verify, kyc required. TrustLayer Protocol: none collected, no kyc.

Which one can a developer query from an API?

Galxe Passport and TrustLayer Protocol

Can Galxe Passport and TrustLayer Protocol be used together?

Yes. They produce independent signals, so apps commonly combine a personhood check with a continuous reputation score before granting access or rewards.

Check a wallet against TrustLayer now

Trust scores, verifier counts and score factors are public and queryable — one request, no key required for read endpoints.

Keep reading