Proof of personhood · Proof of personhood

BrightID vs Proof of Humanity

BrightID (social graph verification parties) and Proof of Humanity (video registry with crypto-economic challenges) both aim at sybil resistance, but they disagree on 3 of 12 measurable attributes. This page compares them field by field from published protocol behaviour — no marketing scores, no invented metrics.

BrightID

BrightID derives uniqueness from a human-verified social graph. Privacy posture is strong; onboarding depends on scheduled live sessions with other people.

Openness 9/10

Proof of Humanity

Proof of Humanity trades privacy for adversarial auditability: registrations are public videos anyone can challenge with a deposit. Sybil resistance is enforced economically.

Openness 9/10

Attribute comparison

AttributeBrightIDProof of Humanity
CategoryProof of personhoodProof of personhood
NetworkChain-agnostic (bridged attestations)Ethereum / Gnosis
How a person is provenVideo verification parties building a social graph analysed for uniquenessPublic video submission, vouching, and dispute resolution via Kleros arbitration
Biometric dataNone collectedNone collected
KYC requirementNo KYCNo KYC
Hardware neededAny phone or laptopAny phone or laptop
Key custodyUser holds the keysUser holds the keys
Reputation modelBinary human / not humanBinary human / not human
Native tokenNoneNone
Public read APIYesYes
Open source coreYesYes
Who can revoke youGraph analysis can drop a node below the verification thresholdAnyone can challenge a registration; arbitration decides removal

3 of 12 attributes differ; 9 are identical.

Openness criteria, scored openly

The matrix scores what a protocol asks of a user and how much of the result stays verifiable in public. It is not a quality, security or market ranking, and it is not derived from TrustLayer trust scores.

CriterionBrightIDProof of Humanity
No biometric collectionmax 22/2None collected2/2None collected
No KYC requirementmax 22/2No KYC2/2No KYC
No specialised hardwaremax 11/1Any phone or laptop1/1Any phone or laptop
User-held keysmax 22/2User holds the keys2/2User holds the keys
Continuous reputationmax 10/1Binary human / not human0/1Binary human / not human
Public read APImax 11/1Documented public endpoints1/1Documented public endpoints
Open source coremax 11/1Core implementation is public1/1Core implementation is public
Total9/109/10

Best fit for BrightID

  • Communities able to run recurring live verification sessions
  • Projects avoiding biometrics and KYC entirely

Best fit for Proof of Humanity

  • Governance systems that want an adversarial, publicly auditable registry
  • Communities comfortable with public video identity

Verdict

On the openness criteria below, BrightID scores 9/10 and Proof of Humanity scores 9/10 — 3 of 12 attributes differ. BrightID asks less of the user up front; Proof of Humanity offers a stronger external anchor where its trust assumptions are acceptable. Pick by what you must not collect, and by whether you need a one-off human check or a score that keeps moving.

Frequently asked questions

What is the main difference between BrightID and Proof of Humanity?

Network: BrightID — Chain-agnostic (bridged attestations); Proof of Humanity — Ethereum / Gnosis.

Does BrightID or Proof of Humanity require biometrics or KYC?

BrightID: none collected, no kyc. Proof of Humanity: none collected, no kyc.

Which one can a developer query from an API?

BrightID and Proof of Humanity

Can BrightID and Proof of Humanity be used together?

Yes. They produce independent signals, so apps commonly combine a personhood check with a continuous reputation score before granting access or rewards.

Check a wallet against TrustLayer now

Trust scores, verifier counts and score factors are public and queryable — one request, no key required for read endpoints.

Keep reading